Gerontology Impact F的問題,透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們查出實價登入價格、格局平面圖和買賣資訊

Gerontology Impact F的問題,我們搜遍了碩博士論文和台灣出版的書籍,推薦Waldstein, Shari (EDT)/ Kop, Willem (EDT)/ Katzel, Leslie寫的 Cardiovascular Behavioral Medicine 和的 Anthropology in Medical Education: Sustaining Engagement and Impact都 可以從中找到所需的評價。

這兩本書分別來自 和所出版 。

國立體育大學 競技與教練科學研究所 鄭世忠、錢桂玉所指導 杨永的 運動訓練與停止訓練對中老年人骨骼肌氧合能力與身體功能表現之影響 (2022),提出Gerontology Impact F關鍵因素是什麼,來自於爆發力訓練、阻力訓練、心肺訓練、近紅外線光譜儀、停止訓練。

而第二篇論文長庚科技大學 護理系碩士在職專班 趙莉芬所指導 鄒季蓉的 探討鄉村中高齡慢性病患者資訊科技化健康識能與科技接受度之相關性研究 (2021),提出因為有 資訊科技化健康識能、資訊科技健康照護系統、科技接受模式、鄉村、慢性病的重點而找出了 Gerontology Impact F的解答。

接下來讓我們看這些論文和書籍都說些什麼吧:

除了Gerontology Impact F,大家也想知道這些:

Cardiovascular Behavioral Medicine

為了解決Gerontology Impact F的問題,作者Waldstein, Shari (EDT)/ Kop, Willem (EDT)/ Katzel, Leslie 這樣論述:

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and most other westernized nations. It is well recognized that traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease have limited predictive utility in the identification of new cardiovascular disease cases and

outcomes. Thus, investigators have argued that application of a biopsychosocial research paradigm in this field may be of particular utility in understanding cardiovascular disease pathogenesis. Accordingly, a subdiscipline within the field of behavioral medicine - cardiovascular behavioral medicin

e - examines interrelations among biological, behavioral, psychological, and social factors in cardiovascular health and disease.In 1989, Schneiderman and colleagues published a seminal work entitled "Research Methods in Cardiovascular Behavioral Medicine." Since that time, there has been an exponen

tial increase in the amount and scope of work in this topic area, but no similar edited volume has been undertaken. Here we propose to create a compendium of work in the field of cardiovascular behavioral medicine, the purposes of which are to summarize research in this area, promote multidisciplina

ry research and clinical practice, and encourage researchers and clinicians to consider all relevant facets of the disease process in their evaluation and study of cardiovascular disease pathogenesis and outcomes.In this volume, we propose several sections.Section I will provide an overview of basic

cardiovascular anatomy and physiology, cardiovascular disease classification, and application of the biopsychosocial model to the study of cardiovascular disease. Section II will cover sociodemographic, behavioral, psychosocial, biomedical, and psychophysiological risk factors for cardiovascular di

sease. Each chapter will offer a discussion of construct definition, measurement issues, and epidemiological evidence for relations to cardiovascular disease. Chapters on biomedical and psychophysiological risk factors will also describe sociodemographic, behavioral, and psychosocial correlates of t

hese risk factors. Section III will summarize literature on biopsychosocial investigation of specific cardiovascular disease entities, the evidence base for relevant biopsychosocial interventions, and evaluation of the impact of cardiovascular diseases on behavior. Section IV will cover select speci

al topics in the field of cardiovascular behavioral medicine including common comorbidities, special populations, special issues, and data analytic issues.This volume is unique in several respects. First, there is no similar work available in terms of the scope of topic coverage. Second, the inclusi

on of relevant measurement issues and construct definitions of a comprehensive set of risk factors will be of great assistance to researchers and clinicians in this area who wish to improve their assessment of these variables yet are not familiar with or trained in the various methodologies. Third,

the use of multidisciplinary contributors will greatly enhance the utility of the work.The primary audiences for this work are multidisciplinary researchers, clinicians, and students in cardiovascular behavioral medicine or behavioral medicine more broadly. Representative disciplines include psychol

ogy, psychiatry, medicine, nursing, and epidemiology. The prospective authors listed below represent each of these disciplines. Shari Waldstein, Ph.D. is an associate professor of psychology at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. She received her masters and doctoral degrees in clinical

psychology from the University of Pittsburgh and completed her clinical psychology internship at Brown University, with special training in cardiovascular behavioral medicine. Her research program in cardiovascular behavioral medicine combines conceptual and methodological approaches from behaviora

l medicine, biomedicine, neuropsychology, and psychophysiology. One area of collaborative investigation examines the impact of cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular reactivity, and cardiovascular disease on cognitive function and quality of life among older adults. A second area of investigati

on involves the study of individual differences in the magnitude and patterning of acute cardiovascular responses to mental stress. Dr. Waldstein is recipient of an Early Career Award from the American Psychosomatic Society (APS), an Outstanding Contributions to Health Psychology (Early Career) Awar

d from Division 38 of the American Psychological Association (APA), and a Distinguished Service Award from the Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM). She is a Fellow of APA Division 38 (Health Psychology), SBM, and the Academy of Behavioral Medicine Research. Dr. Waldstein has served as an Associate

Editor for the journal Health Psychology, as a member of the APS’s Executive Council, as Member-at-Large for Division 38 (Health Psychology) of the APA, and as Chair of the Education and Training Council for the SBM’s Board of Directors. Currently, she is president-elect of the American Psychosomati

c Society. She has edited one book and has authored or co-authored 54 articles and book chapters.Willem J. (Wijo) Kop, Ph.D. is an associate professor of medicine (Cardiology) and director of the recently developed Behavioral Cardiology Program at the University of Maryland Medical Center. His resea

rch focuses on cardiovascular diseases and other disorders where fatigue plays a major role. Dr. Kop is actively involved in the fields of psychosomatic and behavioral medicine and health psychology. He has served on several NIH review panels and the editorial boards of Health Psychology and Psychos

omatic Medicine. Dr. Kop is the recipient of the 1998 Early Career Award of the American Psychosomatic Society and the 2002 Outstanding Contributions to Health Psychology Award from the American Psychological Association.Leslie Katzel, M.D., Ph.D. is an associate professor of medicine at the Univers

ity of Maryland School of Medicine. As Associate Director for Clinical of the Baltimore GRECC, Dr. Katzel oversees the GRECC Clinical Demonstration Projects. Dr. Katzel attends on the general medical service at the Baltimore VA Medical Center and is director of the fourth year medical student clinic

al and research elective in geriatrics and gerontology, as well as director for the research elective in gerontology for medical housestaff. He is recognized for his contributions to the ethical oversight of research conducted at UMB. He lectures frequently on the ethical oversight of research and g

ood clinical practice guidelines, and chairs several safety monitoring boards. At a national level, he serves as a consultant/site visitor for the Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP).

運動訓練與停止訓練對中老年人骨骼肌氧合能力與身體功能表現之影響

為了解決Gerontology Impact F的問題,作者杨永 這樣論述:

運動是一種改善中老年人骨骼肌氧合能力、提高肌肉力量並最終影響整體身體功能表現的有效方式。然而,較少的研究評估不同運動類型之間訓練效益的差異。此外,由於中老年人生病、外出旅行與照顧兒童等原因,迫使運動鍛煉的中斷。如何合理安排運動訓練的週期、強度與停訓週期,以促使中老年人在未來再訓練快速恢復以往訓練效益,目前亦尚不清楚。本文以三個研究建構而成。研究I:不同運動訓練模式對中老年人的骨骼肌氧合能力、肌力與身體功能表現的影響。以此探討50歲及以上中老年人進行每週2次為期8週的爆發力、阻力訓練以及心肺訓練在改善中老年人肌肉組織氧合能力、與肌肉力量身體功能效益的差異。我們的研究結果表明:爆發力組在改善下肢

肌力、最大爆發力與肌肉品質方面表現出較佳的效果。心肺組提高了30s坐站測試成績並減少了肌肉耗氧量,從而改善了中老年人在30s坐站測試期間的運動經濟性。年紀較高的肌力組則對於改善平衡能力更加有效。此外,三組運動形式均有效改善了中老年人人敏捷性。研究 Ⅱ:停止訓練對運動訓練後中老年人肌力與身體功能表現的影響:系統性回顧與meta分析。本研究欲探討停止訓練對運動訓練後中老年人肌力與身體功能表現訓練效益維持的影響。我們的研究結果表明:訓練期大於停止運動訓練期是肌力維持的重要因素。若訓練期

Anthropology in Medical Education: Sustaining Engagement and Impact

為了解決Gerontology Impact F的問題,作者 這樣論述:

Iveris L. Martinez, PhD is Professor, Archstone Foundation Endowed Chair in Gerontology, and Director of the Center for Successful Aging at California State University, Long Beach. She was a founding faculty member of the Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine (HWCOM) at Florida International Universi

ty where she served as chief of the Division of Medicine & Society and chaired the admissions committee for the college for five years. Between 2007 and 2018, she developed and delivered course content on health disparities, cultural competence, and social determinants of health at HWCOM, as well as

led an annual interprofessional clinical workshop across the health sciences. An applied anthropologist, she has received funding from the National Institutes of Health, the Macarthur Foundation, and others for her community-based research on social and cultural factors influencing health, with an

emphasis in aging, Latinos, and minority populations. Her current research interests include improving services for caregivers of persons with Alzheimer’s, reducing social isolation in aging, as well as interprofessional efforts to create age-friendly communities. She previously served as the Chair

of the Board of the Alliance for Aging, Inc., the local area agency on aging for Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties, and President of the Association for Anthropology, Gerontology, and the Life Course. She received a joint PhD in Anthropology and Population & Family Health Sciences (Public Health) from

Johns Hopkins University.Dennis Wiedman, PhD, is Professor of Anthropology, Department of Global and Sociocultural Studies. Florida International University. Miami, Florida. He received his PhD in Anthropology from the University of Oklahoma in 1979 where he trained in medical anthropology at the Un

iversity of Oklahoma College of Medicine. Employment in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Miami School of Medicine in the Office of Transcultural Education and Research grounded him in clinical anthropology as Director of a Department of Psychiatry community mental health unit. His r

esearch interests include Native American health, organizational culture, applying anthropology, and directing culture change. He specializes in social and cultural factors for the global pandemic of Type II diabetes and metabolic syndrome. He teaches medical anthropology, anthropological theory, an

d ethnohistorical research methods. He is the Founding Director of the FIU Global Indigenous Forum with the mission to bring the Indigenous voice to FIU, South Florida, and the world. During more than a decade in the FIU Provost Office he was the University Accreditation Officer and first Director o

f Program Review. As lead strategic planner for the university’s first major strategic plan he had a key role in planning and envisioning the new FIU Medical school incorporating medical anthropology principles and a community focus. He served on the Executive Board of the American Anthropological A

ssociation (AAA) in the practicing/professional seat, and was President of the National Association for the Practice of Anthropology (NAPA). Throughout these academic, applied, and practicing leadership experiences, he consistently published on organizational culture theory and analysis in leading j

ournals and book chapters.

探討鄉村中高齡慢性病患者資訊科技化健康識能與科技接受度之相關性研究

為了解決Gerontology Impact F的問題,作者鄒季蓉 這樣論述:

背景:人口快速老化,慢性疾病與身體功能障礙的盛行率急遽上升,就醫及長照需求負擔繼而增加。延緩失能策略多元興起,疾病自我管理為健康促進重要之一環,隨著醫療科技技術與數位周邊的興盛推進,健康資訊科技化運用亦迅速蓬勃發展。然而,年長者及特定族群之資訊科技化健康識能與科技接受度,是發展健康照護數位系統時需考慮的。目的:本研究旨在探討鄉村中高齡慢性病患資訊科技化健康識能及科技接受度之相關性。研究方法:為橫斷式研究設計之描述性相關性研究,採立意取樣進行收案,對象為雲嘉地區45歲以上中高齡者,經醫師診斷為慢性疾病至某區域教學醫院門診就診者。採結構式訪談問卷進行資料蒐集,包含(1)人口學特性結構問卷;(2)

資訊科技健康照護系統接受度問卷;(3)中文版資訊科技化健康識能量表,來探討中高齡慢性病患資訊科技化健康識能與科技接受度(知覺有用性、知覺易用性、使用意圖)的相關因素分析。經研究倫理委員會審核通過後開始收案,收案時間為民國110年3月至6月。資料分析採描述性統計,與變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關與多元迴歸分析進行推論性統計。結果:有效收案樣本數為120人。資料分析發現相較於全國人口,收案的偏鄉長者的教育程度較低;45%未使用資訊科技健康照護系統;資訊科技化健康識能為中低程度,而科技接受度以「知覺有用性」構面得分最高,「知覺易用性」最低。鄉村地區中高齡慢性病患「性別」、「主要照顧者」、「教育程度」、「

生活費」、「視力狀況」、「擁有智慧型產品數」、「智慧型產品連網方式」及「年齡」等變項,分別與資訊科技化健康識能、和科技接受度具顯著相關(p