Cultural difference的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們查出實價登入價格、格局平面圖和買賣資訊

Radical Realism, Autofictional Narratives and the Reinvention of the Novel

為了解決Cultural difference的問題，作者Doloughan 這樣論述：

This monograph is concerned with what it sees as two complementary phenomena: that of contemporary writers of fiction who seem to have turned their backs on the traditional novel in favour of what might be termed a radical realism, alongside a more general movement towards and interest in auto/bi

ography and memoir in the post-truth era. By reviewing the work of four authors whose trajectory to date represents engagement with novelistic as well as auto/biographical forms, it reconsiders differences between ’fiction’ and ’non-fiction’, as they pertain to both production and reception, includi

ng issues of generic categorization, the prevalence or exclusion of specific textual markers, and readerly expectations in navigating diverse and shifting literary cultures.The Norwegian author Karl Ove Knausgaard’s Min Kamp (My Struggle) series is considered in English translation in relation to it

s cross-cultural reception; it is also placed within the context of Knausgaard’s oeuvre as a whole. Some parallels between the work of Knausgaard and that of Rachel Cusk are drawn, though in the case of the latter the focus is not so much on the memoirs but on the Outline trilogy that followed the t

rilogy of memoirs and the extent to which it represents both a departure from and a continuation of some of the concerns expressed in previous non-fictional works with a specific focus on Aftermath. Comparison of Jeanette Winterson’s semi-autobiographical debut novel, Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit,

with her memoir entitled Why Be Happy When You Could Be Normal? allows for close textual reading of scenes initially treated in novelistic form and revisited in the memoir permitting discussion of points of similarity and difference in their treatment in relation to the constraints and affordances

of genre, where these apply. Discussion of Xiaolu Guo’s memoir, Once Upon A Time in the East, focusses both on its cross-cultural reception and on the place of the memoir within the Guo corpus.In some ways all four writers are less concerned with traditional aspects of story and more concerned to de

ploy a range of forms, including narrative, to serve their interest in broader questions of truth, agency and self-understanding.

Cultural difference進入發燒排行的影片

羅蘭·巴特符號思維啟示下仿古街區的路徑發展研究—以鹽鎮水街為例

為了解決Cultural difference的問題，作者周穎 這樣論述：

隨著全球化進程與全面實行現代意義的城市建設，中國各城市文化面臨著嚴峻的發展壓力。仿古街區是眾多城市文化建設中的一個分支，是體現城市文脈延續的良好方式。但當文化依循著市場需求、經濟的調整而失去它自身本位時，文化便落入了一種形式符號，成為資本增值的生產象徵。本作為改善城市的均質現象、增加地方活力的積極途徑，變成了被操控、且被批判的消極對象。因此，面對各城市現存的邊緣化仿古街區，亟待被認知其自身的處境與價值，並為其找到可以指導良序發展的理論依據。在本研究中，首先，通過文獻的對比轉變了傳統看待仿古街區的視角，確認了仿古街區應該具備群體性、流動性、公共性內涵，突出了地方文化與場域發展應基於地方居民的特

徵。其次，基於仿古街區作為符號運作的載體之一，本研究借助了符號學理論對其場域文化符碼被神話化的背後邏輯進行了探索，並主要以對羅蘭巴特言語觀與整體觀的分析，延伸了得以服務於地方話語得以融入原權利話語團體的轉換層級，並將其轉化成模型。接著，選取了一個個案場域，通過定性與定量的工具使得基於地方的話語與場域關係的連結圖得以建立，最終確認了四條主要關係的關係連結圖，並供研究進一步對比、評估並調整場域神話文本的重視項，進而提出各路徑發展策略。結果表明，一方面，地方人所關注的點的優先性與神話文本確實存在差異性；另一方面，仿古街區的場域職能不僅僅只是旅遊經濟的一種形式，更是一個結合、調動地方居民、地方知識、地

方文化資源的網絡資訊中心，確認了屬於仿古街區價值的落腳點。本研究不僅提供了針對仿古街區的新的思考範式，也期為日後如何實踐仿古街區的獨立性、多樣性以及整體性發展提供了參考依據。

At the Crossroads of Music and Social Justice

為了解決Cultural difference的問題，作者 這樣論述：

Music is powerful and transformational, but can it spur actual social change? A powerful collection of essays, At the Crossroads of Music and Social Justice studies the meaning of music within a community to investigate the intersections of sound and race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orienta

tion, and differing abilities. Ethnographic work from a range of theoretical frameworks uncovers and analyzes the successes and limitations of music’s efficacies in resolving conflicts, easing tensions, reconciling groups, promoting unity, and healing communities. This volume is rooted in the Crossr

oads Section for Difference and Representation of the Society for Ethnomusicology, whose mandate is to address issues of diversity, difference, and underrepresentation in the society and its members’ professional spheres. Activist scholars who contribute to this volume illuminate possible pathways a

nd directions to support musical diversity and representation.At the Crossroads of Music and Social Justice is an excellent resource for readers interested in real-world examples of how folklore, ethnomusicology, and activism can, together, create a more just and inclusive world. Brenda M. Romero

is Professor Emerita at the University of Colorado, Boulder. She earned a PhD in Ethnomusicology from the University of California, Los Angeles, and a BMus and a MMus in Music Theory and Composition from the University of New Mexico. In addition to extensive research in New Mexico, she conducted fie

ldwork in Mexico, Colombia, and Peru, including as Fulbright Scholar in Mexico in Colombia. Her monograph, Matachines Transfronterizos, Warriors for Peace at the Borderlands is forthcoming.Susan M. Asai is Professor Emerita from the Music Department at Northeastern University in Boston. Her research

encompasses Japanese folk performing arts and Asian American music and cultural politics. She has published numerous articles and encyclopedic entries on Japanese/Asian American music and identity. Asai’s book projects include Nōmai Dance Drama: A Surviving Spirit of Medieval Japan and Sounding Our

Way Home: Japanese American Musicking and the Politics of Identity (forthcoming).

行動裝置教育方案於腦中風患者之成效

為了解決Cultural difference的問題，作者余秋菊 這樣論述：

背景與目的：衛生福利部統計2019年腦血管疾病是造成臺灣地區民眾十大死因的第4名，腦中風發生的6個月內有超過25%的病患導致嚴重失能，慢性疾病皆是腦中風的致病危險因子，針對這些疾病的治療及控制是可降低腦中風的發生率，故需長時間監控及配合慢性疾病藥物治療，改變飲食習慣及建立良好的健康生活型態，提供病患出院返家後疾病相關知識。護理人員扮演著教育者的角色，傳統護理指導大部份給予紙本單張及口頭教育，然而現今資訊科技的進步及行動網路3C產品的普及化，可提供即時、個別化，是目前臨床照護上最即時及有效率的方式。因此，本研究探討行動裝置教育方案於腦中風病患提升自我照顧知識、自我效能及避免憂鬱之成效。研究方法

：本研究在臺灣北部某醫學中心之神經內科病房及老年醫學病房進行收案，採兩組前、後測，隨機、單盲之實驗性研究設計，收案82位，包括實驗組40位(行動裝置教育方案)及控制組42位(常規護理)，分別於住院48小時內進行前測及介入，出院前24小時進行後測之施測。研究問卷包含腦中風自我照顧知識量表(Stroke Self-Care Knowledge)、腦中風自我效能量表(Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, SSEQ)、貝克憂鬱量表(Beck Depression Inventory, BDI)、健康指導內容滿意度之視覺類比量表(Visual Analogue Scal

e, VAS )，以套裝統計軟體SPSS 20.0版進行統計分析，進行描述性統計及推論性統計。描述性統計以次數分配、百分比、平均數、標準差、最大值及最小值呈現研究對象之人口學資料及疾病特徵；推論性統計以獨立樣本t檢定、卡方比較兩組在人口學基本屬性、疾病特徵、腦中風自我照顧知識、腦中風自我效能、憂鬱及介入措施滿意度之差異，運用廣義估計方程式(generalized estimating equation, GEE)檢定兩組之前、後測腦中風自我照顧知識、腦中風自我效能及憂鬱改善成效，再以獨立樣本t檢定統計比較兩組介入措施滿意度之差異。研究結果：本研究之研究對象為老年、男性、已婚、退休、高中職、佛道

教為主，共病指數(Charlson Comorbidity Index, CCI)平均值為2.28，過去病史以高血壓為主、其次為糖尿病。行動裝置教育方案介入後兩組腦中風自我照顧知識於組別主效果( β = 6.88, SE = .78, p < .001)、時間主效果( β = -6.15, SE = .71, p < .001)、組別與時間交互作用( β = -6.93, SE = .89, p < .001)皆呈統計學上顯著差異；腦中風自我效能(SSEQ)於組別主效果( β = 16.80, SE = 2.46, p < .001)、時間主效果( β = -33.66, SE = 2.78,

p < .001)、組別與時間交互作用( β = -6.46, SE = 4.02, p < .001)皆呈統計學上顯著差異；憂鬱(BDI)改善成效於組別主效果( β = -7.29, SE = 1.50, p < .001)、時間主效果( β = 8.37, SE = 1.77, p < .001)、組別與時間交互作用( β= 5.28, SE = 2.09, p < .001)皆呈統計學上顯著差異；以獨立樣本t檢定統計方式比較實驗組(行動裝置教育方案)與控制組(常規護理)的介入措施滿意度，呈統計學上顯著差異( p < .05)，即表示此行動裝置教育方案介入措施的滿意度比常規護理有明顯成

效。結論：本研究結果證實透過行動裝置教育方案於腦中風患者，可以有效提升腦中風自我照顧知識、腦中風自我效能程度成改善憂鬱程度，行動裝置教育方案較傳統口頭健康指導有較高的介入滿意度。臨床與實務應用：在實證依據基礎下，使用行動裝置教育方案於腦中風患者之成效更較傳統口頭健康指導成效佳，且具有統計學上顯著差異。因應3C化數位時代來臨，手機及網路使用普及化，希望能藉由腦中風行動裝置教育方案方便性、健康指導內容生動性，且有具個別性的優點，能促進提升臨床護理人員在病患住院期間提供返家後健康指導內容，更能減少的時間人力成本。對於需要長期復健治療之腦中風患者更能提供持續性的照護內容，藉由操作行動裝置教育方案過程，

更可以促進患者與家人之間的親情互動，值得在臨床上推廣。